Land Stewardship Project

Land Stewardship Project
  • About Us
    • Our Mission
    • Long Range Plan
    • Staff Directory
    • Board of Directors
      • LSP Board Committees
    • LSP Steering Committees & Working Groups
    • Contact Us
    • Past LSP Projects
    • Employment & Volunteer Opportunities
    • LSP Publications
    • Financial Statements
  • The Latest
    • Community Care
    • Songs for the Soil
    • CSA Farm Directory
    • Upcoming Events
    • News
      • News Releases
      • Media Contacts
      • LSP in the News
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Land Stewardship Letter
    • LIVE-WIRE Sign-up
    • Myth Busters
    • Fact Sheets
    • Farm Crisis Resources
  • For Farmers & Landowners
    • Farmland Clearinghouse
    • New Farmers
      • Farm Beginnings Class
      • Journeyperson Course
      • Farm Dreams
      • Accessing Farmland
      • Farmland Clearinghouse
      • Beginning/Retiring Farmer Tax Credit
      • Beginning Farmer Profiles
      • Fresh Voices Podcast Series
    • Retiring Farmers & Landowners
      • Farmland Clearinghouse
      • Farm Transition Course 2026
      • Conservation Leases
      • Beginning/Retiring Farmer Tax Credit
      • Land Transition Tools
      • Transition Stories
    • Soil Health
      • Cover Crops
      • Grazing
      • No-till
      • Microbiology
      • Kernza
      • Soil Builders’ Network
      • Soil Builders’ E-Letters
      • Soil Health Steering Committee Members
      • Ear Dirt Soil Health Podcast Series
    • Cropping Systems Calculator
    • Conservation Leases
  • Creating Change
    • Community-Based Food Systems
      • Ear Bites Community-Based Food Podcast Series
    • Policy Campaigns
      • Soil Health & Climate Change
      • Healthcare
      • Factory Farms
        • Anti-Competitiveness & Price Gouging
        • LSP Powerline Story Center
      • Federal Policy
        • A Farm Bill For Us
      • State Policy
        • MN Farm, Food & Climate Funding
      • Developing Leadership
    • Justice & Stewardship
    • Organizational Stewardship
  • Get Involved
    • Your Membership Matters
    • Take Action!
    • Upcoming Events
    • Land Stewardship Action Fund
    • Connect with LSP
      • Stay Connected
      • Join, Donate, or Renew Today!
      • Shop
      • Employment & Volunteer Opportunities
      • Legacy Giving
    • Network with LSP Members
      • Farmland Clearinghouse
      • Soil Health
    • Farmland Clearinghouse
  • Join, Donate, or Renew Today!
  • Stay Connected
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
Search
More...

Who Benefits When Emerging Farmers Can’t Succeed?

Emerging Farmers: What Do You Think of This Proposed Legislation?

By Amanda Koehler
April 4, 2024

Share

  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • email

Last year, the Land Stewardship Project celebrated the historic investments in emerging farmers that we won at the Minnesota Capitol. One of these wins included doubling the funding for and prioritizing emerging farmer applicants within the Minnesota Farmland Down Payment Assistance Program, which the Land Stewardship Project worked on with the Midwest Farmers of Color Collective and Latino Economic Development Center. “Emerging farmers” are farmers from historically underserved communities, including Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC), immigrants, women, veterans, persons with disabilities, young and beginning farmers, LGBTQ+ farmers, and others.  

When the program was first launched, it was clear that demand for the program was significantly higher than the available funding. In 2023, for example, only 66 of 172 applicants were able to be funded. Since resources are limited, prioritizing emerging farmers, which are historically underserved, is not just the right thing to do. It benefits all of us. By diversifying our farming population, we are building a more resilient, just and sustainable farm and food system. 

This was an important step towards not only recognizing the importance of emerging farmers, but reckoning with our state and country’s history of generations of disenfranchisement of historically underserved populations, particularly BIPOC farmers engaged in our farm and food system. But, as we all know, sometimes making history garners backlash based in the discomfort of shifting away from the status quo. 

Earlier this year, a right-wing, California-based law firm began waging a “discrimination” lawsuit over the prioritization of emerging farmers. They recruited as their plaintiff one of the 106 applicants in August of 2023 who did not receive a Down Payment Assistance Grant — it was a white, male farmer from northern Minnesota who does not fit into the “emerging” definition. While this was a disappointing development, it isn’t an isolated one. A few years ago, a few white farmers claimed they had been discriminated against and sued the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture to challenge a debt forgiveness program that targeted socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers, including Black farmers. Lawsuits like these are driven by white supremacy. These lawsuits wouldn’t exist if these programs were only prioritizing veterans or young and beginning farmers.  

As members, organizers, and allies of LSP wrote in a Star Tribune commentary published recently: “Lawsuits like this are a distraction from what we should really be asking: Why are we allowing industrial agriculture to swallow up a massive majority of public funding in our farm and food system while the rest of us are left fighting over the crumbs? For example, of the $48 million in new spending included in the 2024-25 Minnesota Agriculture Budget passed by the Legislature, $25 million (52%) was for biofuel incentives and infrastructure while only $4.4 (15.7%) million was for grants and services for beginning and emerging farmers. In 2023, it would have taken just $2.58 million to fund all qualified applicants for the Down Payment Assistance Grant, getting 172 new farmers onto the land.

“When lawsuits like this are filed, it’s important to ask: Who benefits by maintaining the status quo? In this case, corporate interests. By keeping us fighting over the scraps of public resources, corporate interests pit emerging farmers and small and mid-sized non-emerging farmers against each other. This helps distract the public’s attention away from how much public support is shoveled into corporate welfare. Rather than scapegoating emerging farmers, we have an opportunity to build solidarity and change how the system is failing all of us, no matter our backgrounds.” 

Rather than fighting over a tiny sliver of the pie, we can make the Upper Midwest the best place to start a farm by providing all the resources, capital, training, and technical assistance aspiring, beginning, and emerging farmers need to start and sustain successful farms. Rather than be distracted by a culture war, emerging and non-emerging small and mid-sized farmers need to band together and fight for more. 

However, the lawsuit requires legislative action. It’s not a position we should be in — we’re in it because of racism, racism that is pervasive within our court system, especially the U.S. Supreme Court. Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent rulings on affirmative action in higher education, both the state of Minnesota and legal experts that Midwest Farmers of Color Collective and LSP consulted agree that it is unlikely that we will win this lawsuit if the Legislature does not make the statute around the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Rural Finance Authority grant programs “race neutral.” Going forward with the lawsuit not only puts this program at risk, but programs like it across sectors (i.e. education, housing) and states. The Legislature has no choice but to amend the statute. 

Because LSP has the capacity, legislative experience, and relationships with lawmakers to dedicate to this issue, we have helped coordinate a group of emerging farmer-led and emerging farmer-serving organizations to ensure the new statute is strong and to raise our voices in hearings about the pervasiveness of racism in our farm and food system. While we have taken a leadership role in coordination, as a white-led, majority white organization, it’s important that we uplift our BIPOC allies and follow their lead. We are following the leadership of BIPOC organizations when it comes to bill language, strategy, and narrative. 

This process was initially very challenging. When legislative activity began on this a couple months ago, policymakers writing the new language had minimal communication, consultation, and collaboration with emerging farmer organizations. Together, we made sure emerging farmers would be heard in this process. In other words, we took the stand of insisting that there be “nothing about us without us.” Moreover, until the first hearing in the Senate, there was no public comment from any policymakers about why we’re in this position. Our BIPOC farmers deserve, at bare minimum, acknowledgement that white supremacy is the cause of the erasure of BIPOC farmers in these state statutes.  

While we shouldn’t be in the position of choosing between the future of critical programs and the prioritization of emerging farmers within them, we are. Therefore, LSP and our partners have come together to workshop language with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture that works for emerging farmers. 

At this point, both the House and Senate are both proposing to maintain the definition of an emerging farmer for the purposes of the Emerging Farmers Working Group and Emerging Farmers Office. Otherwise, the House and Senate proposals differ. 

The House’s proposal: 

    • For the Farmland Down Payment Assistance Program, replace the prioritization of emerging farmer applicants with the prioritization of eligible applicants with limited land access who raise specialty crops, hemp, or cannabis or had less than $100,000 in gross sales in the previous year.  
    • For the Beginning Farmer Equipment and Infrastructure Grants, replace the prioritization of emerging farmer applicants with the prioritization of applicants with limited land access or limited market access. 
    • For Technical Assistance Grants to community development financial institutions (CDFIs) that participate in USDA loan or grant programs, eligible entities serve small farmers or farmers experiencing limited land access or market access, rather than emerging farmers. 
    • No changes to the Beginning Farmer Tax Credit. 
    • The proposed definition for “limited land access” includes those farming under a lease or other rental arrangement of no more than thee years in duration (not including those leasing/renting from a relative by blood or marriage) or is farming by renting land from an incubator farm that primarily raises specialty crops. 
    • The proposed definition of “limited market access” includes those who sell a majority of their annual farm produce direct-to-consumer. 

The Senate’s proposal: 

    • For the Farmland Down Payment Assistance Program, replace the prioritization of emerging farmer applicants with the prioritization of applicants with limited land access or those with gross farm profit of $100,000 or less in the previous year. Eligibility is also limited to those who have participated in the business operation of a farm for at least three years. 
    • Currently, the Beginning Farmer Tax Credit sets aside 50% of funding for those who sell or rent land or agricultural assets to emerging farmers. It also provides a 12% tax credit, rather than 8%, for those who sell or rent land or agricultural assets to emerging farmers. The Senate’s proposal would instead focus the set-aside and increased tax credit on those who sell or rent land or agricultural assets to beginning farmers experiencing limited land access. 
    • For the Beginning Farmer Tax Credit, replace the increased tax credit for the sale or rental of agricultural land or assets to emerging farmers with the prioritization of applicants with limited land access or those with gross farm profit of $100,000 or less in the previous year. 
    • For the Beginning Farmer Equipment and Infrastructure Grants, replace the prioritization of emerging farmer applicants with the prioritization of applicants with limited land access. 
    • No changes to Technical Assistance Grants to CDFIs that participate in USDA loan or grant programs. 
    • The proposed definition for “limited land access” includes those farming without ownership of land and (a) is under a lease or other rental arrangement of no more than three years in duration (not including those leasing/renting from a relative by blood or marriage), or (b) is farming by renting land from an incubator farm, or (c) is farming with not current lease or other rental arrangement, or (d) is farming where access to land is constrained by Tribal ownership patterns, treaties, or federal and Tribal laws and regulations. 

LSP and partners engaged on this issue are working with each other, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, and the House and Senate Agriculture Committee Chairs to finalize language that works for Minnesota’s emerging farmers. Please let us know if you have feedback!  

LSP policy manager Amanda Koehler can be reached via e-mail.

Category: Blog
Tags: beginning farmers • emerging farmers • farmland access • Minnesota Legislature • racial discrimination • racial justice

Upcoming Events

×

October 2025

Wednesday October 29

4:00 pm – 6:00 pm
Book Event: We Can Do Better: Collected Writings on Land, Conservation, and Public Policy
Wednesday October 29
4:00 pm – 6:00 pm
Book Event: We Can Do Better: Collected Writings on Land, Conservation, and Public Policy
The Harkin Institute for Public Policy & Citizen Engagement, 2800 University Ave, Des Moines, IA 50311, USA

The Johnson Center for Land Stewardship Policy is excited to share that one of our its primary pillars of work — a published collection of Paul Johnson’s writings —  is set for release on Oct. 2.  The book features a brief biography and a discussion of Paul’s ideas within the historical and future contexts of private lands conservation. 

For details on We Can Do Better: Collected Writings on Land, Conservation, and Public Policy click here.

Thursday October 30

5:00 pm – 6:00 pm
Book Event: We Can Do Better: Collected Writings on Land, Conservation, and Public Policy
Thursday October 30
5:00 pm – 6:00 pm
Book Event: We Can Do Better: Collected Writings on Land, Conservation, and Public Policy
Ames Public Library, 515 Douglas Ave, Ames, IA 50010, USA

The Johnson Center for Land Stewardship Policy is excited to share that one of our its primary pillars of work — a published collection of Paul Johnson’s writings —  is set for release on Oct. 2.  The book features a brief biography and a discussion of Paul’s ideas within the historical and future contexts of private lands conservation. 

For details on We Can Do Better: Collected Writings on Land, Conservation, and Public Policy click here.

November 2025

Saturday November 1

6:15 pm – 9:15 pm
Community Potluck & Folk Dance in Bay City, Wis.
Saturday November 1
6:15 pm – 9:15 pm
Community Potluck & Folk Dance in Bay City, Wis.
W6275 Main St, Bay City, WI 54723, USA

Calling all folk dance lovers! The Land Stewardship Project is co-sponsoring a potluck and folk dance at the Town Hall in Bay City, Wis., on Saturday, Nov. 1. Can you attend or volunteer? LSP is looking for one or two more people to help represent our people-powered organization by tabling at this event. To volunteer, reply directly to this e-mail and let me know you’re available. 
 
For details, check out this flier. 

The potluck and dance are co-hosted by LSP members from Oxheart Farm and the Oak Center General Store. No RSVP required; please direct questions to Emmet at oxheartfarm@gmail.com.
 

Folk Dance Flyer 2025.jpg

Tuesday November 4

11:00 am – 12:00 pm
Birds in the Balance: Pest Control Services Across Crop Types
Tuesday November 4
11:00 am – 12:00 pm
Birds in the Balance: Pest Control Services Across Crop Types
Online

This 10-lesson Wild Farm Alliance virtual course teaches agricultural professionals and farmers how to support beneficial birds and manage pest birds on farms. By learning how to assess the farm’s avian needs and opportunities, farms can be designed to provide for a diversity of beneficial birds. 

If pest birds are a problem, they can be discouraged with specific practices during the shorter periods when they cause damage. The sessions cover the latest research, tools and resources, and are given by experts in avian pest control, entomology, ornithology and conservation. While many topics and species are specific to the Midwest, most of the principles discussed are applicable across regions. 

Continuing Education Credits have been requested and are expected to be approved from American Society of Agronomy.

For details and to register, click here. 

The Course Schedule:

LESSON 1

Why Birds Belong on the Farm: Biodiversity, Pest Control & A Thriving Landscape

Tuesday, September 23, 2 p.m. CT


LESSON 2

Birds as Pest Control Allies on the Farm

Tuesday, October 14, 11 a.m. CT


LESSON 3

Birds in the Balance: Pest Control Services Across Crop Types

Tuesday, November 4, 11 a.m. CT


LESSON 4

Integrating Habitat into Croplands: Prairie Strips and Bird Conservation

Tuesday, December 2, 11 a.m. CT


LESSON 5

Birds on the Farm: Balancing Biodiversity and Food Safety

Tuesday, January 13, 11 a.m. CT


LESSON 6

Beyond the Crop: Birds, Biodiversity, and the Power of Edge Habitat

Tuesday, February 3, 11 a.m. CT


LESSON 7

Bridging Forestry, Farming, and Habitat

Tuesday, February 24, 11 a.m. CT


LESSON 8

Perennial Pathways: Agroforestry for Birds and Biodiversity on Farms

Tuesday, March 17, 11 a.m. CT


LESSON 9

Birds on the Range: How Grazing Practices Shape Habitat for Grassland Species

Tuesday, April 7, 11 a.m. CT


LESSON 10

Birds at Risk: How Pesticides Shape Safety on Agricultural Lands

Tuesday, April 28, 11 a.m. CT

7:00 pm – 9:30 pm
Big Ag, Big Problems: LSP Panel on Rural Consolidation
Tuesday November 4
7:00 pm – 9:30 pm
Big Ag, Big Problems: LSP Panel on Rural Consolidation
Lanesboro Community Center, 202 Parkway Ave S, Lanesboro, MN 55949, USA

 
The concentration of money and power in our food and farming system is a threat to our rural way of life, the land, and Main Street economies. According to research compiled by Farm Action, agricultural industries ranging from poultry processing to seed distribution are now dominated by four or fewer corporations, creating a system that for all intents and purposes no longer represents an open market situation. This makes it next to impossible for small and mid-sized farms to compete economically.  

Those of us who grew up in the rural Midwest have seen these effects firsthand. As once vibrant agricultural economies diminish, so too do community resources: hospitals, public schools, religious institutions, grocery stores, and more. Young people who see little opportunity in their hometowns move to cities and suburbs to start their careers and families. 
 
A consolidated, corporate-controlled agricultural system is also wreaking havoc on our natural environment. Runoff from large-scale factory farms and row cropping operations threatens our drinking water and spoils natural landscapes that people from all walks of life cherish. Without intervention, it won’t be long before all of us — urban or rural, farmers and non-farmers, rich or poor, young or old — will be impacted by the devastation of Big Ag. 

Join the Land Stewardship Project on Tuesday, Nov. 4, to hear from two people who think a lot about the power of Big Ag and its negative impacts — Austin Frerick and Sonja Trom Eayrs. They will lead a discussion about the forces threatening our rural communities and how we build the people power to take them on. 

This is an opportunity to take the first steps toward developing the kind of positive future for our communities that builds homegrown wealth, treats people fairly, and is resilient in the long term. If you love something and someone, you fight for it. Come fight with us! 
 
Austin Frerick Biography: Austin Frerick is an expert on agricultural and antitrust policy. In 2024, he published his debut book, Barons: Money, Power, and the Corruption of America’s Food Industry.
 
Sonja Trom Eayrs Biography: Sonja Trom Eayrs, author of Dodge County, Incorporated: Big Ag and the Undoing of Rural America, is a farmer’s daughter, rural advocate, and attorney.

To register for this event, click here.

View Full Calendar

Recent Posts

  •  ‘Big Ag, Big Problems’ Panel to Feature 2 Experts on Consolidation Nov. 4 in Lanesboro October 27, 2025
  • Reflections from LSP’s 2025 Summer Events Season October 24, 2025
  • Another Farm Crisis Looms, but it’s Not too Late to Take Action October 23, 2025
  • Tell Congress: Support Market Access for Farmers by Funding Local Food Purchasing October 22, 2025
  • Tell Congress a Farm Bailout is Not the Solution: We Must Invest in America’s Small & Mid-Sized Farmers October 22, 2025

Montevideo

111 North First Street
Montevideo, MN 56265

(320) 269-2105

Lewiston

180 E. Main Street
Lewiston, MN 55952

(507) 523-3366

Minneapolis

821 E. 35th Street #200
Minneapolis, MN 55407

(612) 722-6377

  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Land Stewardship Project. All rights reserved.

https://landstewardshipproject.org/who-benefits-when-emerging-farmers-cant-succeed